Conjugated Block Copolymer Photovoltaics with near 3% Efficiency through Microphase SeparationA Fully Integrated Nanosystem of Semiconductor Nanowires for Direct Solar Water Splitting
Changhe Guo, Yen-Hao Lin, Matthew D. Witman, Kendall A. Smith, Cheng Wang,
Alexander Hexemer, Joseph Strzalka, Enrique D. Gomez, and Rafael Verduzco
Dead Body: Some BCP PV have been attempted, but efficiencies are low. Mostly this is attributed to nonconjugated insulating backbones. For bulk heterojunction organic PVs, the main difficulty is getting a good bulk heterojunction, so control over the molecular interface is lacking.
Prior work: High open-circuit voltages have indeed been demonstrated for solar cells where the active layer is comprised of blends of P3HT and other dioctylfluorene bisthienyl-benzothiadiazole alternating copolymers, 25 ternary blends composed of similar conjugated block copolymers as P3HT-b-PFTBT with donor and acceptor homopolymers,26 or polymer blends with fluorene benzothiadiazole alternating copolymers as acceptor molecules.
Solution: Use fully conjugated BCPs where phase separation is on order of 10nm for exciton extration. Lamellae is a good morphology because it has a large amount of surface area for a small amount of required exciton diffusion. the importance is getting blocks which line up well to transport the charge efficiently and have different enough HOMO and LUMO levels for a voltage separation.
What are the most interesting results:
- 3% efficiency, 1.2 Voc, 5mA/cm2 Isc
- higher temperature, and shorter annealing, gave better PV results
- homopolymer blends of the individual BCPs didn't result in very good PV cells
- they didn't test the capacitance, might be interesting to see C-V curve
What are the most interesting discussions:
- Interestingly, an EQE value of 31% was recorded at 400 nm where the exciton generation is mostly attributed to the optical absorption of PFTBT, suggesting efficient exciton dissociation from photoexcitations in the acceptor domains.
- RSXRS is useful for measurement because PFTBT and P3HT differ by 285.4eV in the core electron transitions.
- They suggest that the 18nm domain spacing means that the individual domains are roughly 9nm, or similar to the exciting diffusion length
- The XRS measurments both say that at a higher annealing temperature, the BCP self-assembles into a perpendicular lamellae, so that is why the lower temp annealing isn't as good for PV
- the face-on stacking of the P3HT enhance hole extraction because higher conduction along pi-pi stacking.
- suggested that the PFTBT assembly helps to orient the P3HT to be face-on instead of head-on
- covalent bonding across the donor−acceptor interface has the potential to control charge separation and charge recombination rates
- choosing bcp blocks with complementary, instead of overlapping, absorption spectra could help performance
Materials used:
- poly(3-hexylthiophene)−block−poly-((9,9-dioctylfluorene)-2,7-diyl-alt-[4,7-bis(thiophen-5-yl)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazole]-2′,2″-diyl) (P3HT-b-PFTBT)
- 56 wt% P3HT, 29 kg/mol total
- 18nm domain spacing
- 60-70 nm thick from anhydrous chloroform
How this applies to my work:
- could this use templating? if so, how much could it increase the ordering. Or could it decrease defects which might recombine excitons
- could plasmonic NPs be incorportated to assist in the absorption?
- It makes sense that the lamellae would be short circuiting across both electrodes. Is there a way to ensure that only a single block be on the top and bottom respectively?
- The importance of high chi here...with higher chi, the intersection of the two blocks will be finer and therefore offer a better voltage liley
- couldn't solvent annealing be used? It will probably give btter order
- they didn't image with SEM or TEM. That can help with testing the order of the film.
Applications:
Cited -
My own -
No comments:
Post a Comment